Illicit retransmission of sports events

scpa BERTRAND
10.12.21 12:37 Comment (s)
Illicit retransmission of a sporting event - lawyer in sports law

The law project on the regulation and protection of access to cultural and digital works adopted by the National Assembly on October 25, 2021 includes new provisions making it possible to strengthen the fight against the illicit retransmission of sporting events.

Noting the weakening of the economic model of professional sport Due to the exponential development of audiovisual rights piracy, the National Assembly adopted on October 25, 2021, a bill in order to fight more vigorously against this phenomenon.

Article 24 of the Law n ° 2017-261 of March 1, 2017 aimed at preserving the ethics of sport already allowed federations and other organizers of sports competitions to conclude agreements with Internet players in order to adopt a set of measures and practices intended to fight against the promotion, access and making available to the public online, without right or authorization, sports audiovisual content. 

However, Law n ° 2021-1382 of 25 October 2021 relating to the regulation and protection of access to cultural works in the digital age constitutes a major advance in the context of the fight against the illicit retransmission of sports events and competitions since it establishes an ad hoc procedure allowing in particular the blocking or delisting of the disputed online communication service (I). In addition, the legislator created the Audiovisual and Digital Communication Regulatory Authority (“ARCOM”), responsible in particular for noting infringements through its investigative powers (II).

Establishment of an ad hoc procedure before the Judicial Court in order to obtain the blocking or delisting of a website 

Article 3 of the bill n ° 2021-1382 of October 25, 2021 created in Book III, Title III, Chapter III, Section 3 (Fight against the illicit retransmission of sports events and competitions) of Sports Code, Article L.333-10who predict :

« I.- When serious and repeated infringements of the audiovisual exploitation right provided for in article L. 333-1 of this code have been observed, the neighboring right of an audiovisual communication company provided for in article L. 216-1 of the Intellectual Property Code, when the program concerned consists of an event or a sports competition, or a right acquired exclusively by contract or audiovisual exploitation agreement of a competition or sports event, caused by the content of an online public communication service whose main objective or one of the main objectives is the unauthorized dissemination of competitions or sports events, and in order to prevent or remedy a new serious and irremediable infringement of these same rights, the holder of this right may apply to the president of the judicial tribunal, ruling according to the accelerated procedure on the merits or in summary proceedings, for the purposes of obtaining all measures propor measures designed to prevent or put an end to this infringement, against any person likely to help remedy it.

In this regard, the following may also refer to the president of the judicial tribunal, under the conditions provided for in the first paragraph of this I:

1 ° A professional sports league, in the event that it markets the audiovisual exploitation rights of professional sports competitions, likely to be the subject or the subject of the infringement mentioned in the same first paragraph;

2 ° The audiovisual communication company, in the event that it has acquired an exclusive right, by contract or audiovisual exploitation agreement, on a competition or sporting event, whether this competition or sporting event is organized on French territory or abroad, provided that this right is liable to be or is the subject of the infringement mentioned in the said first paragraph ».
Ce new device allows any holder of a retransmission right of a competition or sporting event (sports federations, professional leagues, organizers, and clubs) to refer the matter to the President of the Judicial Court in the event of serious or repeated attacks to this right occasioned by "thethe content of an online communication service to the public whose main objective or one of the main objectives is the unauthorized broadcasting of competitions In order to " prevent or remedy a new serious and irremediable damage To this right.

The legislator thus establishes a dedicated judicial procedure intended to fight more effectively against illicit retransmissions.

Article L. 333-10 of the Sports Code continues: 

« II.-The president of the judicial tribunal can in particular order, if necessary under penalty, the implementation, for each of the days appearing in the official calendar of the competition or the sporting event, within the limit of a period of twelve months, all proportionate measures, such as blocking or withdrawal or de-listing measures, capable of preventing access from French territory to any online communication service to the public, identified or which has not been identified in the date of the said order, illicitly disseminating the competition or sports event or whose main objective or one of the main objectives is the unauthorized dissemination of the competition or sports event. The measures ordered by the president of the judicial tribunal end, for each day appearing in the official calendar of the competition or sporting event, at the end of the broadcast authorized by the holder of the exploitation right of this competition or of this event (...) ».

Thus, the President of the Judicial Tribunal may to order, under penalty, all proportionate measures to prevent or put an end to these infringements such as blocking or de-listing measures. 

These measures, which will make it possible to prevent access, from French territory, to any online public communication service illegally broadcasting the sports competition for each day appearing in the official competition calendar will however be limited to twelve months, what the Council of State considers proportionate to the desired goal.
CSA and the fight against illegal streaming of sports competitions
ARCOM, new regulator in the fight against illicit streaming with enhanced investigative powers and relay between judicial authorities and right holders

ARCOM, to regulate the fight against illegal streaming

In addition, this law enabled the creation of ARCOM, merger of the Superior Audiovisual Council ("CSA") and the High Authority for the Diffusion of Works and the Protection of Rights on the Internet ("HADOPI").

ARCOM and its agents will be with new investigative powers in order to note the infringements and to ask the intermediaries to act. In this sense, ARCOM will act as a relay for the judicial authority. 
Article L. 333-11 of the Sports Code:

«The authorized and sworn agents of the Audiovisual and Digital Communication Regulatory Authority may note the facts likely to constitute infringements of the rights mentioned in Article L. 333-10.

In this context, these agents can, without being held criminally responsible:
1 ° Participate, under a pseudonym, in electronic exchanges likely to relate to infringements of the rights mentioned in the same article L. 333-10;
2 ° Reproduce sports events or competitions broadcast on online public communication services;
3 ° Extract, acquire or keep by this means evidence on these services for the purposes of characterizing the facts likely to constitute infringements of rights;
4 ° Acquire and study the hardware and software suitable for facilitating the commission of infringements of the rights mentioned in said article L. 333-10.

Under penalty of nullity, these acts may not have the effect of inciting others to commit an offense.
The agents record the information thus collected in a report, which gives an account of the conditions under which the faculties recognized in 1 ° to 4 ° of this article have been used. ».

Or book a video appointment online

ARCOM and the fight against illegal streaming mirror sites

ARCOM will also have the possibility to establish " blacklists »Sites, that is to say the sites " seriously and repeatedly infringing copyright or neighboring rights ». 

The purpose of this public list is to oblige advertisers, advertising agencies and other payment services to declare the existence of business relationships with sites registered on this blacklist.

Finally, ARCOM, will also play an updating role in blocking or dereferencing so-called "mirror" sites.

Indeed, when blocking or removing an illegal streaming site, it is common to see a true copy emerge shortly after. In order to avoid having to initiate the same procedure for each mirror site, ARCOM will make it possible to block these mirror sites more quickly. 

In accordance with article 34 of law n ° 2021-1382 of 25 October 2021, these provisions come into force on 1er January 2022

Article L. 331-25 of the Intellectual Property Code:

"I.- Pursuant to the mission mentioned in 1 ° of Article L. 331-12, the Audiovisual and Digital Communication Regulatory Authority may make public the entry on a list of the names and actions of those online communication services to the public having been the subject of a deliberation in the context of which it was found that these services seriously and repeatedly infringe copyright or neighboring rights.
[...]
V.- The list mentioned in I can be used by the signatories of the voluntary agreements provided for in article L. 331-12. During the entire period of registration on this list, advertisers, their agents, the services mentioned in 2 ° of II of article 299 of the general tax code and any other person in commercial relation with the services mentioned in I of this article, in particular to carry out advertising insertions or to provide means of payment, make public, at least once a year, under conditions specified by the authority, the existence of these relations and mention them, where appropriate, in the management report provided for in II of Article L. 232-1 of the Commercial Code ... "

L. 331-27 of the Intellectual Property Code

“I.- When a legal decision which has become final has ordered any measure to prevent access to an online communication service to the public in application of Article L. 336-2, the Authority regulation of audiovisual and digital communication, referred to by a rights holder party to the judicial decision, may ask any person affected by this decision, for a period not exceeding that remaining to run for the measures ordered by the judge, to prevent access to any online communication service to the public incorporating all or substantially the content of the service mentioned by the said decision. For the application of this I, the Audiovisual and Digital Communication Regulatory Authority communicates precisely the identification data of the service in question, according to the terms it defines.

Under the same conditions, the authority can also ask any operator of a search engine, directory or other referencing service to stop the referencing of electronic addresses giving access to these communication services to the public online ... ”.
Illegal streaming and new legal provisions for wrestling - sports law lawyer

On the same theme, see the following articles:

The French Football Federation wins a battle against Viagogo

[26.12.2016]

Right to information and sports clips

[12.10.2014]

scpa BERTRAND