Positive doping control, AFLD procedure and appeal?

Bertrand Cabinet
02.06.21 14:39 Comment (s)
World Anti-Doping Code 2021 - cabinet bertrand lawyer

An anti-doping control carried out in France (national or international athlete) with a positive result leads to a presumption of infringement of anti-doping rules and the opening of a disciplinary procedure before the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) .

Reminder of the founding texts on the fight against doping

The repression of acts of doping in France is governed by the Sports Code.


This regime is the product of a transposition of the provisions of the World Anti-Doping Code to which France committed by ratifying the UNESCO International Convention against Doping in Sport adopted in Paris on October 19, 2005.


The most recent transposition results from theOrdinance No. 2021-488 of April 21, 2021 entered into force on May 31.

sports code and anti-doping - lawyer
positive doping control - lawyer

Positive doping control and notification of abnormal analysis report

Un control is said to be positive when, following a doping control, the analysis of a sample provided by an athlete rindicates the presence of a prohibited substance, its metabolites or its markers (Article 2.1 of the World Anti-Doping Code; L. 232-9-1 Sports Code). The use of a prohibited substance is established in particular in two cases (R. 232-64 Sports Code
    • the analysis result of Sample A is positive and the Athlete has not requested analysis of Sample B;
    • the analytical result of sample B confirms the presence of the prohibited substance detected in sample A. 

When the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) has information to identify a presumption of anti-doping rule violation (ADRV), such as the presence of prohibited substances in a sample, the Secretary General shall inform the 'interested (L.232-21-1 and s. Sport Code) by a letter from "notification of an alleged anti-doping rule violation".

Analysis of sample B

During an anti-doping control, the collection of the sample is distributed in a vial A, "sample A" and a vial B, "sample B "

Sample A is examined primarily by the accredited laboratory in charge of analyzing the sample.

From the receipt of the notification of the alleged infringement, the athlete concerned may submit written explanations and request within five days that the analysis of the sample B be carried out at his own expense (R. 232-88 Sports Code).

Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE): definition

An athlete may suffer from chronic diseases or disorders which oblige him, within the framework of medical treatment, to take certain drugs or to follow certain methods which appear on the list of prohibited substances. A therapeutic use exemption (TUE) may allow the athlete to use the required substance or method (L. 232-2 Sports Code).

This TUE request must be made to the AFLD or to the international federation in the event of participation in an international competition at least 30 days before the start of the competition for which the athlete will need a TUE. It is mandatory, prior to the use of such substances or methods. In other words, no TUE with retroactive effect can be granted, except in exceptional circumstances. On the other hand, the retroactive TUE procedure is allowed for athletes who are not considered to be of international or national level. The AFLD provides the athlete with a model form to be completed and signed by him and his doctor.

Or book a video appointment online

The disciplinary procedure before the French Agency for the Fight against Doping (AFLD)

The competence of the AFLD College to initiate disciplinary proceedings in the event of a positive doping control

If the sports federations have had competence for a long time to sanction acts of doping, it is the French Agency for the fight against doping (AFLD) which now has the power to sanction since the Ordinance of 19 December 2018 n ° 2018- 1178 (L. 232-22 Sports Code).


Thus by virtue of Article L. 232-22 paragraph 3 of the Sports Code, "When the college decides to initiate proceedings under this article, the secretary general of the Agency shall notify the grievances to the person concerned, as well as a proposal for entry into the process of administrative composition.."

The entry proposal in the process of administrative composition

The Secretary General of the Agency sends the interested party a entry proposal in the process of administrative composition.

La administrative composition or waiver of the hearing (R. 232-88 to R.232-89-1 of the Sports Code) allows the athlete to enter into an agreement with the secretary general of AFLD.

By this agreement, the athlete undertakes to recognize the infraction and to accept the consequences..

Notification of grievances to the AFLD Sanctions Commission

In parallel with this proposal for entry into administrative composition, the AFLD College initiates disciplinary proceedings against the person concerned. 

If the administrative composition is successful, the College validates the agreement concluded between the person concerned and the Secretary General of the Agency.

If the administrative composition fails, the AFLD college submits the notification of grievances is sent to the Sanctions Commission who may pronounce disciplinary sanctions if necessary, after sending the athlete a letter of notification of grievances.

Doping controls at international sporting events

During international events, it is the international federations that are competent to carry out checks and carry out sanctions. AFLD retains jurisdiction under the conditions set out in article L. 232-16 of the Sports Code :

"On the occasion of an international sporting event, the French Anti-Doping Agency can:

1 ° At the request of the international sports organization responsible for the event, carry out checks on the site of the event on behalf of this organization. In addition, it may take additional samples or request the laboratory responsible for analyzing them to perform additional types of analysis. It informs the international body;

2 ° After having obtained the agreement of the competent international body or, failing that, of the World Anti-Doping Agency, carry out additional controls on the site of the international sporting event;

3 ° Diligent controls outside the site of the event, coordinating with the international body responsible for the event.

These controls are carried out under the conditions provided for in Articles L. 232-12, L. 232-13-1, L. 232-13-2 and L. 232-14 to L. 232-14-4."

Appeal to the Council of State or the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Le Board of state is competent to rule on actions of unlimited jurisdiction in appeal against pronounced sanctions decisions by the Ccollege and / or the Sanctions Commission of AFLD (L. 232-24 Sports Code).

When offenses have been committed by international level athletes or on the occasion of a international sporting event, it's the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) which is competent to rule against the sanctions of AFLD taken in its sole capacity as a signatory organization of the World Anti-Doping Code (L. 232-24-2 Sports Code).

Recall that the disciplinary prescription in matters of doping is ten (10) years


"The disciplinary action is prescribed by ten years completed from the date of the violation of the provisions of this chapter. This period is interrupted by any act of investigation or prosecution.


During this period, the agency may have analyzes carried out on the samples taken, of which it has custody."

(L.232-24-1 Sport code)

world anti-doping agency - football lawyer
While 192 States have now ratified the 2005 UNESCO Convention, worldwide divergences have been noted between States in the transposition of the provisions of the World Anti-Doping Code. Thus, the repression of acts of doping abroad is carried out by virtue of the rules specific to each country. 

On the same theme, see the following articles:

[24.02.2021]

[20.02.2020]

Bertrand Cabinet